Why is webscripts under webapp? Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Improve this answer. Sean Patrick Floyd Sean Patrick Floyd k 61 61 gold badges silver badges bronze badges. Just an addition, if you wanted to exclude several folders add them after a comma, dont use several warSourceExcludes, it wouldn't work — Jesus Benito.
Thomas Thomas 1, 1 1 gold badge 11 11 silver badges 20 20 bronze badges. What do you mean by "ignored when copying"??? If they are not copied to the war file - they are not packaged in the war file, and it's the same as packagingExcludes.
Can you explain it more clearly? This is incorrect and misled me for a while. I am using version 2. It looks like in newer versions the packagingExcludes is the correct tag to use. You need to specify the directory where the files are reside in your application structure.
Also you need to specify the file types to be excluded using exclude tag. Below code excludes any file name ending with. This code also helpful to exlude anyother file types. All you need to do is provide proper file extension. Below code excludes any file ends with.
By default, Project A's classpath will include:. Suppose you don't want project D and its dependencies to be added to Project A's classpath because some of Project-D's dependencies are missing from the repository, and you don't need the functionality in Project-B that depends on Project-D anyway. Unfortunately, they didn't. The answer is Yes. Project-A has declared that it doesn't need Project-D to run, so it won't be brought in as a transitive dependency of Project-A.
It may also supply an additional repository, from which it can resolve Project-E. In this case, it's important that Project-D is not excluded globally, since it is a legitimate dependency of Project-Y. As another scenario, suppose the dependency you don't want is Project-E instead of Project-D.
How do you exclude it? See the diagram below:. Exclusions work on the entire dependency graph below the point where they are declared. If you want to exclude Project-E instead of Project-D, simply change the exclusion to point at Project-E, but you don't move the exclusion down to Project-D. Thus, we need to exclude them.
The issue is going from log4j 1. Because some of these artifacts are not available from the central Maven repository, due to licensing issues, they will not be automatically installed to your local repository. This causes a big problem as it essentially prevents you from building your project. Thankfully, Maven make it easy to exclude dependencies from a certain project. Looking at the log4j 1. Here are the actual dependencies for log4j 1.
To exclude these dependencies, add the log4j 1. Note that you have to explicitly exclude each one, there is no way to exclude all of the dependencies for a project, but there is a feature request for such an ability. The issue here is that the log4j 1. What does an optional dependency mean? The Maven website has a pretty good explanation. Your project will still need all of the dependencies to build, but other projects that reference yours will only need the optional dependencies if they are using the additional features.
Also worthy to note: exclusions are done on a per-dependency basis. This means that the dependencies that we excluded from log4j are only excluded from the log4j scope. This has the effect of not globally excluding those dependencies. So, for example, if we added another dependency that did really require the javax. Furthermore, if we wanted, we could manually add a dependency to our own list for that JMS artifact, and it would show up as normal.
Any ideas why eclipse:eclipse is acting up on this one? Thanks very much for the detailed explanations. This is what I did. But I saw that the pattern of log messages in not what I set in my log4j. It seemed it picked some other config file.
0コメント